Another honest mistake

Nothing to see here.....compare and contrast...

View attachment 17966
Sorry imatim, but would have to agree with TET upon photo evidence in this case.
The only way to settle such incidents would be with VAR, even if they remain to highlight just how cheating the mibs remains still.
Watch enough football within the EPL and how such tackle are looked upon.
There seems to be a total misunderstanding between what is classed as a lung tackle and a sliding tackle when both are made by a player going to ground.
The sliding tackle is when the ball is away from the opponent and the follow through misses the player playing the ball, so still remains totally legit within the game still.
The lung tackle however, brings a whole new element of equations into play, so hence many players tend to shy away from such challenges especially with VAR in operation, and agree it has cleaned the game up more so, except in Scotland when such challenges are deemed as exceptable still, unless a celtic player should make such a challenge.
To clarify, when you lung into a tackle like so, its late, the follow through catches the player, so dangerous, and even a potential case for studs shown also, so a lung tackle is deemed as reckless and dangerous and the offence is classed as a straight red, everywhere else except within Scottish football still.
The real question highlights is how mibs still can't and won't apply the rules still?
VAR only helps to confirm the action, even if it can make the tackle look worse than it really was.
Gone are the days when such tackles were classed as, welcome to the game, that will teach you, the lie of making a genuine attempt for the ball when the opponent was really the 1st prize and even better if you got something on the ball as it usually saved the booking, so you could still carry on with the thuggery.
The lung tackle has quite rightly imo been taken away from the game as such, but it's still very relevant within the Scottish game still, for 2 reasons imo, to still allow for imtimerdation purposes and free hits upon Celtic players still, who remains the only team of actually trying to play football still.
The Scottish FA should be ashamed of themselves for still allowing this backwards approach to the modern game, and believe that Celtic still need to call out the agenda still that, rules are still being applied to the benifit of one team only still, aided with the help of cheating mibs still, and the cop out of this retrospective nonsense still.
 
The MIBS are posted for this Sunday against Livingston
Nick Walsh is the ref (He's had more than a few dodgy decisions go against us)
Frank Connor and Calum Spence are his assistant referees, with Bobby Madden serving as the fourth official
Predict your scores accordingly
HH
 
Last edited:
Sorry imatim, but would have to agree with TET upon photo evidence in this case.
The only way to settle such incidents would be with VAR, even if they remain to highlight just how cheating the mibs remains still.
Watch enough football within the EPL and how such tackle are looked upon.
There seems to be a total misunderstanding between what is classed as a lung tackle and a sliding tackle when both are made by a player going to ground.
The sliding tackle is when the ball is away from the opponent and the follow through misses the player playing the ball, so still remains totally legit within the game still.
The lung tackle however, brings a whole new element of equations into play, so hence many players tend to shy away from such challenges especially with VAR in operation, and agree it has cleaned the game up more so, except in Scotland when such challenges are deemed as exceptable still, unless a celtic player should make such a challenge.
To clarify, when you lung into a tackle like so, its late, the follow through catches the player, so dangerous, and even a potential case for studs shown also, so a lung tackle is deemed as reckless and dangerous and the offence is classed as a straight red, everywhere else except within Scottish football still.
The real question highlights is how mibs still can't and won't apply the rules still?
VAR only helps to confirm the action, even if it can make the tackle look worse than it really was.
Gone are the days when such tackles were classed as, welcome to the game, that will teach you, the lie of making a genuine attempt for the ball when the opponent was really the 1st prize and even better if you got something on the ball as it usually saved the booking, so you could still carry on with the thuggery.
The lung tackle has quite rightly imo been taken away from the game as such, but it's still very relevant within the Scottish game still, for 2 reasons imo, to still allow for imtimerdation purposes and free hits upon Celtic players still, who remains the only team of actually trying to play football still.
The Scottish FA should be ashamed of themselves for still allowing this backwards approach to the modern game, and believe that Celtic still need to call out the agenda still that, rules are still being applied to the benifit of one team only still, aided with the help of cheating mibs still, and the cop out of this retrospective nonsense still.

Ask your self this.

If a Celtic player made a tackle like has been highlighted here and in other instances what would be the outcome?

Didn’t Porteous go for something similar and McGregor, et al?

I think I’m also right in saying, that when put on the spot, one of the Hun commentators stated that the tackle in question via video replay, would no doubt be looked at had VAR been available. When a Hun says this.....you know the rest.

So why the inconsistency in the application of the rules?...
 
Ask your self this.

If a Celtic player made a tackle like has been highlighted here and in other instances what would be the outcome?

Didn’t Porteous go for something similar and McGregor, et al?

I think I’m also right in saying, that when put on the spot, one of the Hun commentators stated that the tackle in question via video replay, would no doubt be looked at had VAR been available. When a Hun says this.....you know the rest.

So why the inconsistency in the application of the rules?...
We all know what the outcome of such tackles would be imatim, a straight red and rightly so, and in turn we don't make such challenges.
Never seen a video of the incident, even if the photo gives the impression of another reckless challenge and a red card should have been awarded.
This rule hasn't been applied in Scotland from the very first game of the season and still can't or won't be applied, and though I made that clear enough also.
 
Watched highlights of Hearts v Aberdeen after hearing that Robbie Neilson had a disagreement with Jim Goodwin after Neilson called Lewis Ferguson a diver, after he went down easily to get a penalty
Craig Gordon made a great save though, and the Jam Tarts won 2-0
Seems there's just no pleasing some people :rolleyes:
 
Watched highlights of Hearts v Aberdeen after hearing that Robbie Neilson had a disagreement with Jim Goodwin after Neilson called Lewis Ferguson a diver, after he went down easily to get a penalty
Craig Gordon made a great save though, and the Jam Tarts won 2-0
Seems there's just no pleasing some people :rolleyes:
This is the problem within Scottish football still Dilligaf, is how the actual rules of the game are looked upon in Scotland and acted upon.
I believe FIFA set the rules of World football, and EUFA should be making sure there member bodies, such as the Scottish FA are actually carrying out there duties as such.
Please feel free to correct me, if I'm wrong.
Now with the Scottish FA having no VAR in place allows for the cop out.
It still doesn't allow for cheating decisions not been made, where 1 club benifit above everyone else within Scottish football imo.
The result at present is the cheating mib still has far too much power in destroying the product of Scottish football still, and worse still, its allowed to carry on unchallenged still.
Saying that I was disappointed with Forrest last night, with looking like he had been clipped, yet never highlighted any potential contact, so no penalty awarded.
For an experienced player and the modern game the way it is, if a defender goes to ground and in your advantage to win the easy pen, then he should have done so imo.
 
You can maybe understand not getting one of these decisions go your way, but all of them? Meanwhile we have been bombarded with nonsense that the MIBs were actually pro-Celtic in these matches cos we won a corner and one of our player's got booked after trying to pull out of a challenge.

I have no doubt in my mind that every single one of those decisions, had it been Sevco, would have been given.
 
Morelos pushed defender first so whistle should have blown for that..Be giving ten pens every corner if you had to give one for that..Kris Boyd is a biased dirty cheat himself..How that guy is allowed on tv when he clearly cant be impartial regarding Rangers* ? Madden should never be allowed to ref Rangers* or Celtic matches ..On another note , Rangers* play that first half against us , game over at halftime again :)
 
Morelos pushed defender first so whistle should have blown for that..Be giving ten pens every corner if you had to give one for that..Kris Boyd is a biased dirty cheat himself..How that guy is allowed on tv when he clearly cant be impartial regarding Rangers* ? Madden should never be allowed to ref Rangers* or Celtic matches ..On another note , Rangers* play that first half against us , game over at halftime again :)
I never watched the game on the telly - did Monster Munch actually agree with Madhun that it was a penalty? Surely not!
 
I never watched the game on the telly - did Monster Munch actually agree with Madhun that it was a penalty? Surely not!
He didnt just agree , he said Dundee player should have been sent off lol..The way Rangers* play , the coaching staff are telling them to go down even if there is no contact and instructed 3 or 4 players to run to ref demanding a pen as they know theres a string chance it will be given..Kent is on a par with Morelos for his cheating
 
Morelos pushed defender first so whistle should have blown for that..Be giving ten pens every corner if you had to give one for that..Kris Boyd is a biased dirty cheat himself..How that guy is allowed on tv when he clearly cant be impartial regarding Rangers* ? Madden should never be allowed to ref Rangers* or Celtic matches ..On another note , Rangers* play that first half against us , game over at halftime again :)
We will Fukin DESTROY THEM M8 THEY'RE UTTER SHITE!! Wee Fukin Onion Pussies will then try & get game abondoned by whitever means possible!! 🤬🤬🤬🤬
 
I never watched the game on the telly - did Monster Munch actually agree with Madhun that it was a penalty? Surely not!
Monster munch said it was soft but if its a pen its an ordering off as it was a goal scoring opperchancity , ffs, first of all its not a pen moreusless committed the first foul, secondly the ball is over hit and too high for either player to make contact, so without having the ball under control or actually being anywhere near a hun boyd thinks its a goal scoring chance, and thirdly boyd is a diddy,but you know that anyway. 😏
 
Back
Top