50 Shades of Green
Well-known member
It was an og mate.... Goldson jumping with his elbows up (cause thats how ye jump says John Claude Van Clement) and battered him one...How did souter get injured? Ten Bob says it was a shining Charlie coin.
It was an og mate.... Goldson jumping with his elbows up (cause thats how ye jump says John Claude Van Clement) and battered him one...How did souter get injured? Ten Bob says it was a shining Charlie coin.
Last month when we where not doing great there was Celtic fans claiming that the board wanted rangers to win league to keep the old firm brand alive we needs better refs definitely but the abuse they get from fans on forums and social media is a disgrace (I was frustrated as anyone when they got awarded penalty) we never got 3 points because we defended badly and not because a ref wanted us to lose or draw mate ….
Gold hun at a corner fucked him in his thick dome…How did souter get injured? Ten Bob says it was a shining Charlie coin.
The 2 rangers goals where bad defendingI still 100% believe the Celtic board wouldn't see it as a bad thing if Sevco won the league for the sake of the "old firm" brand. I could be wrong but that's my opinion. I just can't think of any other reason why our club stood still and waited for Sevco to catch up with us. I also can't see any other reason why the board didn't back Rodgers in the tranfer windows.
As for not taking 3 points because we defended badly....nonsense. Celtic, IMO, we're poor yesterday. We couldn't string 3 or 4 passes together. The scum bullied us in midfield. Our defence had to contend with long balls and diving all match. The defence conceded but, for the pressure they were put under, they did well......if you want to talk about not taking 3 points...and look at the facts of the match. If between them, Beaton and Walsh, they actually watched the full VAR footage. They would have seen AJ win the ball before Silva took his tumble. And we would have won 3-2, possibly. But we didn't because Beaton and Walsh are a pair a fucking cheats. Go read Celtic by Numbers "A pattern of Assistance".....or remain in your ignorant bliss. Its up to you how you support Celtic.
mate the board don’t want them to win league and to lose out on 50 million but your right the board want us to win league on the cheap as that’s been possible to do past 10 years but now they willl have to spend….we never played good second half but the 2 rangers goals are defensive errors and I never praised Beaton but I don’t think he cheated …that silva is a wee wanker but when you watch on var it looks worse (if it was cheating Beaton would have gave penalty straight away and not booked for diving) if var cheated they wouldn’t have called off the rangers goal …Kuhns yellow wasn’t a yellow ….we never won yesterday because that mob played better than us 2nd half and we made few mistakes and never buried our chances ….as a support we have all these excuses and conspiracy theories but sometimes the answer is just more simpleI still 100% believe the Celtic board wouldn't see it as a bad thing if Sevco won the league for the sake of the "old firm" brand. I could be wrong but that's my opinion. I just can't think of any other reason why our club stood still and waited for Sevco to catch up with us. I also can't see any other reason why the board didn't back Rodgers in the tranfer windows.
As for not taking 3 points because we defended badly....nonsense. Celtic, IMO, were poor yesterday. We couldn't string 3 or 4 passes together. The scum bullied us in midfield. Our defence had to contend with long balls and diving all match. The defence conceded but, for the pressure they were put under, they did well......if you want to talk about not taking 3 points...and look at the facts of the match. If between them, Beaton and Walsh, they actually watched the full VAR footage. They would have seen AJ win the ball before Silva took his tumble. And we would have won 3-2, possibly. But we didn't because Beaton and Walsh are a pair a fucking cheats. Go read Celtic by Numbers "A pattern of Assistance".....or remain in your ignorant bliss. It’s up to you how you support Celtic.
The 2 rangers goals where bad defending
mate the board don’t want them to win league and to lose out on 50 million but your right the board want us to win league on the cheap as that’s been possible to do past 10 years but now they willl have to spend….we never played good second half but the 2 rangers goals are defensive errors and I never praised Beaton but I don’t think he cheated …that silva is a wee wanker but when you watch on var it looks worse (if it was cheating Beaton would have gave penalty straight away and not booked for diving) if var cheated they wouldn’t have called off the rangers goal …Kuhns yellow wasn’t a yellow ….we never won yesterday because that mob played better than us 2nd half and we made few mistakes and never buried our chances ….as a support we have all these excuses and conspiracy theories but sometimes the answer is just more simple
I know we defo defo needs changes in the sfa and also a new breed of refs or even hire foreign refs (depending on the costs) I think the sfa are wankers too mate and I’m not a fans of refs either but I try and not get worked up about them and to attack them (unless I think it’s 100 percent cheating during a game) anyway mate draw wasn’t worse result and let them get beat off Dundee on wed night and we will hammer st Mirren SaturdayIt's not excuses or conspiracy theories anymore Tommy. Cmon man, open your eyes. There is stats and actual, see with your own eyes, evidence to back up the "pattern of Assistance" (Celticbynumbers)
The refs were under the spotlight yesterday, hilariously, Beatons "fuck you Celtic" appointment worked in our favour in some parts. And by that I mean, Goldhun has gotten away with those handballs for the last 2 seasons. If there was anyway the MiBs could have done it again, they would have. Beaton also watched Iwata being fouled, the same sort of foul he was allowing all over the park against Celtic....but again, there was no way, under the scrutiny they were under, that they could have let the goal stand. But they still managed to play a massive part in the outcome.
Celtic weren't great yesterday. But we still went in at half time 2-0 and the scum hadn't really troubled us. Then the diver wins a penalty, that wasn't a penalty and all of a sudden they have their tails up and the match changes. Yes, we could have defended better and saw the game out, but we didn't. And due to the refs, once again having a massive say in the match, we only take a point....ah, the old adage " if we are good enough, the refs shouldn't matter" bullshit line will be trotted out. But that's not fair on the players. The refs shouldn't dictate the outcome of a match...and yesterday, they did.
But if you don't want to see that then that's fine.
What I would say, is that it's the pockets of fans like you, all around the country, that will ensure that there will never be any meaningful change in the Scottish game...I don't mean that to be an insult. How you support the game is up to you. But all clubs need all fans on board to make changes in our sport. The huns don't want it, the SFA don't want it....and as long as there are fans who refuse to see what's happening and saying things like "conspiracy theory" are out there. Change won't happen.
The refs a durty rat bastard Lubo there’s no glossing over that,he gets told to look at the var screen if he’s looking at what we are being shown and then gives a penalty he’s a cheating fraud,,the foul on iwata is three yards away from him it’s a shoe in foul but because they’re breaking he gets excited and goes with it,,your correct yesterday about us not stringing three passes together but we were constantly being fouled with no free kick giving whereas the hunz were getting fouls for absolute nonsense 23 for them??10 against!!!but our defending not by defenders but midfielder,wingers,front guys when we need to batten down the hatches is fuckin shoddy mate,the two goals they get and the one chopped off are Livingston,Ross county level defending,McGregor gives a crazy ball across the middle,but when the ball comes back to sima mcgregor and scales turn there backs at the shot!!!third ones just a wee guy that’s no used to defending or closing down???we didn’t need three forwards on at 90 minutes that’s down to Rodgers,,,It's not excuses or conspiracy theories anymore Tommy. Cmon man, open your eyes. There is stats and actual, see with your own eyes, evidence to back up the "pattern of Assistance" (Celticbynumbers)
The refs were under the spotlight yesterday, hilariously, Beatons "fuck you Celtic" appointment worked in our favour in some parts. And by that I mean, Goldhun has gotten away with those handballs for the last 2 seasons. If there was anyway the MiBs could have done it again, they would have. Beaton also watched Iwata being fouled, the same sort of foul he was allowing all over the park against Celtic....but again, there was no way, under the scrutiny they were under, that they could have let the goal stand. But they still managed to play a massive part in the outcome.
Celtic weren't great yesterday. But we still went in at half time 2-0 and the scum hadn't really troubled us. Then the diver wins a penalty, that wasn't a penalty and all of a sudden they have their tails up and the match changes. Yes, we could have defended better and saw the game out, but we didn't. And due to the refs, once again having a massive say in the match, we only take a point....ah, the old adage " if we are good enough, the refs shouldn't matter" bullshit line will be trotted out. But that's not fair on the players. The refs shouldn't dictate the outcome of a match...and yesterday, they did.
But if you don't want to see that then that's fine.
What I would say, is that it's the pockets of fans like you, all around the country, that will ensure that there will never be any meaningful change in the Scottish game...I don't mean that to be an insult. How you support the game is up to you. But all clubs need all fans on board to make changes in our sport. The huns don't want it, the SFA don't want it....and as long as there are fans who refuse to see what's happening and saying things like "conspiracy theory" are out there. Change won't happen.
Al be shocked if he says it’s not a pen????Ref watch is just about to view the decisions on sky sports news....let's see what they say.
No surprise they take the easy option of saying both were penalties pretty much what I expected from them.Ref watch is just about to view the decisions on sky sports news....let's see what they say.
Must admit I was surprised when CCV wasn't booked for that, and Taylor for a tackle a while later...No surprise they take the easy option of saying both were penalties pretty much what I expected from them.
No real mention of Silva embarrasing antics but incredibly say CCV should have been booked for kicking the ball away and subsequently sent off for some imaginary foul later in the game. WTF
The expert panel eh ??
There you go not shocked in the slightest!!!Al be shocked if he says it’s not a pen????
You get the impression that wee prick dermot Gallagher can’t be arsed even speaking about Scottish football,it all seems too tedious for the soup taking prick,,and her way the hair like a mr whippy ice cream wants to shut the fuck up unless she’s got something to bring to the party??be aswell way ma missus oan the panel she also talks gibberish about football….There you go not shocked in the slightest!!!
Spot on....I did say to myself I won't be watching this shite again.You get the impression that wee prick dermot Gallagher can’t be arsed even speaking about Scottish football,it all seems too tedious for the soup taking prick,,and her way the hair like a mr whippy ice cream wants to shut the fuck up unless she’s got something to bring to the party??be aswell way ma missus oan the panel she also talks gibberish about football….